![]() ![]() ![]() 4 Such statements would be meaningful if and only if we reinterpreted them as statements about the ought of a legal order 5 or about a possible future world. 3 Statements about actual law lose all pretension to scientificity if there is an evident mismatch with the reality they pretends to purport. The problem arises when the line between description and prescription is blurred. 6 When we believe, for certain, that something will not happen, there is no room for rational hope: t (.)ĢOf course, the fact in itself that a theory has a normative goal is not a problem at all.5 As underlined by Mégret (2012: 75), from an idealist perspective, “nternational law is, in a sen (.).4 This is the case, according to Condorelli (2012: 156), of the hope for a future judicial review of (.). ![]() 3 According to Kennedy (2011), this overlap between description and prescription, theory and practice (.). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |